Is it possible to test without code?

Testing is one of the most important sub-disciplines in the field of software engineering. Every component of a project must be tested to ensure the full functionality of the software, to avoid potential bugs, and to ensure that all components communicate correctly.

Due to the need for massive amounts of testing, it has become one of the most time-consuming and resource-intensive tasks of the development process. Often, testing takes more than a quarter of the overall project timeline. These resources required for testing only increase with the number of tests that do not suit you.

Effective testing involves much more than just checking that a specific piece of software is running properly. This requires integration testing, understanding test failures, system testing and even maintaining test automation. With the time and resources required for effective testing, testing without code can reduce overall development time by reducing bottlenecks. But, is it even possible to test without code? It’s time to find out!

coding test hurdles

With modern testing frameworks it has become relatively easy to develop and execute tests. Frameworks provide a great deal of flexibility so that they can be applied to a variety of testing needs. Because of this flexibility, many vulnerabilities can occur, which can make the process of writing and managing tests laborious and susceptible to errors. It all depends on how the individual test is constructed.

After all, what’s more frustrating than finding your problem with the test you’ve set up, not counting the number of times you’ve run the program itself?

A bottleneck refers to a situation in which a large task or a specific part of the project significantly slows down the overall project. Bottlenecks can occur due to various issues like device restrictions or bad coding.

When a bottleneck is found in software, it is usually the result of poor code design and inadequate testing. Adequate testing should detect any potential bottlenecks in the software so that developers can address the bottlenecks.

On top of having bottlenecked software, testing processes also have bottlenecks. When there are bottlenecks for testing, testing can be expedited resulting in lower quality of the overall work. The three types of bottlenecks and common errors in testing include:

1. versatility

Issues of versatility in testing lead to a wide spread of test results, but the issues do not necessarily stem from the tests themselves.

Tests are considered flaky when the results of a test are not repeatable. This leads to unreliable test results making it difficult to get any meaningful insight into the robustness of a piece of software. To fix flaky tests, testers need to find pieces of code that cause changes in results, then adjust those pieces of code accordingly to produce reliable results.

2. Maintenance

Maintenance is not always easy. The practice of modifying tests to keep them current with the modifications in the code is called test maintenance. It is essential to keep the infrastructure of any software system current and relevant, especially if any changes are made to the application or third party infrastructure that the firm employs. An obvious example of test maintenance would be running tests on an up-to-date operating system. Maintaining a test environment can cause bottlenecks for major updates to third-party systems.

Changes to source code can happen frequently in agile organizations – sometimes even multiple times per day. Thus, if the company intends to keep up with the updates made to the code, it is essential to properly maintain the tests.

Maintaining awareness of these changes is another important component of test maintenance. This requires effective communication between all the team members working on the project.

3. Regression Testing

The software development process now includes the practice of regression testing. Regression testing is usually automated to cut down on the time spent on tests that need to be repeated and are more laborious when done manually.

In most cases, an automated regression testing toolkit will include sufficient types of tests, all of which must be maintained to ensure that the program is properly evaluated. The challenging aspect of this is that it can be difficult to strike a balance between the amount of time spent on test maintenance and the time it takes to develop and run a significant number of high-quality tests at each process step.

What is Codeless Testing?

The method of performing automated testing without generating a single line of programming is called codeless automated testing. Regardless of the team member’s degree of expertise, codeless automation makes it possible to simplify the method of creating test scripts.

Developers, company executives, quality assurance engineers and manual testers form a large part of today’s modern developers and designers. These teams increasingly include a mix of different jobs as well. The creation of tests is accelerated by tools that require little or no coding, have a low learning curve, or are codeless. These tools also help reduce the maintenance required and include administrative and reporting capabilities. They help distribute the task of generating, executing and managing tests beyond individuals having expertise with a particular coding language or platform.

The concepts of no code and codeless testing tools are virtually synonymous. These tools are designed to further simplify UI testing by providing functionality that will not call the user to enter some code.

A good number of these techniques use the recording and replay concept. The user or bot first records a position, then, to end the test, they modify it using an editor. They run tests, check for any mistakes that occur, and make necessary modifications until the test yields the desired results.

Importance of codeless testing

No, inferior, or codeless solutions are easier to use than test automation frameworks that require coding. As a result, more people can participate in the organization, reducing testing bottlenecks created by the lack of engineers with coding expertise.

Furthermore, codeless platforms free testers and developers from the laborious coding that is often required to automate tests. Incorporating codeless testing into business testing responsibilities is becoming a great option that can help them speed up the design of their tests and increase the accuracy of their tests.

Plus, codeless automation means more time for both testers and developers, allowing them to focus more on product creation and innovation. This innovation is accomplished by reducing the hours spent coding during manual testing.

Why use codeless testing?

In short, techniques that require minimal, little or no coding reduce the skill level required for UI testing. They speed up the process of creating tests and include built-in capabilities that aid in the management and administration of tests. Some companies also employ AI to reduce the need to update the tests whenever the underlying application is modified. With these capabilities, teams can test code consistently without relying on developers to set aside time for testing. This speeds up the time it takes for a team to deploy updates.

Codeless test results reported in the 2020 Continuous Testing Report

The Continuous Testing Report 2020 indicates that implementing ongoing testing in practice is not a simple initiative. The success of continuous testing is determined by how well it can meet the objectives of the business and the needs of the end users. The test environment is one of the most important constraints in continuous testing and flexible execution. Today, the adoption of artificial intelligence is highly seen in many firms, with respondents indicating that they will use it for data analysis 42 percent of the time.

Even though 55 percent of respondents have already implemented an ongoing testing strategy, culture, operations and technology barriers stand in the way of achievement. Sixty-eight percent of those surveyed agreed or strongly agreed that it is difficult or too difficult to build effective test cases to suit the demands of end users.

Some of the suggestions included in the Continuous Testing Report from the preceding 2020. These findings suggest that the effectiveness of continuous testing is determined by its ability to meet the needs and objectives of the business set by the end users. Here are some tips from continuous test reports that you can use for more effective testing:

  • It is imperative to adopt a new approach that emphasizes on increasing engagement among all relevant disciplines, such as software engineers, quality assurance testers, information security professionals and professionals.
  • The entire software development lifecycle needs to be carefully organized so that you create a single source of information.
  • The transition from looking at quality as a step in the application software lifecycle to seeing quality as a concept for everyone is responsible, from the design phase to production.

conclusion

Codeless testing technologies do an excellent job of reducing the required level of coding expertise, making tests easier to write and manage. On the other hand, codeless solutions often fail to address challenging use cases, which raises the bar for future test management. Coded frameworks provide additional flexibility. However, they also demand specialized skills, require additional time and effort to develop tests and achieve coverage, and continue to have significant costs associated with their maintenance and upkeep.

We are building the ultimate code-less testing platform for everyone, where we address the problems of other no-code testing solutions. If you want to keep up with our updates, you can sign up for our newsletter!

Leave a Comment